The aim of this paper is to determine structure of factors of organizational efficiency in state vocational federations and to evaluate structure of components of belonging variables for analyzing factors of sport organizational efficiency of state vocational sport
federations of B&H. Sample subjects were 36 state sport vocational federations, which are members of Olympic committee of B&H, and 36 representatives of administrative expert bodies of those federations, vocational federations. Sample is made of 8 components and 60 variables, in total. Criteria variables for evaluation of sport organization efficiency are modified according to Hossein Eydi (2013), 8 components: Flexibility, Resources, Planning, Productivity, Information Accessibility, Stability, Cohesive/Joined Work Force, Vocational work force. Research Data are collected by a survey. Normality of distribution of data is tested by Kolmogorov/ Smirnov test, while reliability of measure scale of researched variables is evaluated by Cronbach alpha coefficient. Keiser-Mayer-Olkin and Bartlett test of sphericity confirmed marginal level of benefits of correlation of matrix for conducting factory analysis. Factor analysis,
method of main components and Varimax rotation led to the number of structure factor, which determined level of organizational efficiency of state sport vocational federations. Gutman-Kaiser criterion was used for selection number of main components. KeiserGuttman criterion obtained 86,91% of common variance, which can be explained by 11 isolated factors, (table 1) of samples of sport organizational and vocational sport federations of B&H, respectively. Individual contribution in explaining common variance after Varimax rotation for the first component was 21,70%, F1 Management of processes with compliance of strategic and organizational goals and plans, for the second 13,35%, F2 Quality of intern and extern communication, for the third 9,08%, F3 Financial management in sport organizations, for the fourth 8,34%, F4 Efficiency in performance of decisions made in sport organizations, for the fifth 7,12%, F5 Factor of rewarding, for the sixth 5.81% F6 Competences and efficiency of management, for the seventh 5,60%, F7 Increase of work force, for the eighth 5,47%, F8 Efficiency of attracting the audience, for the ninth 4,18%, F9 Factor of sponsorship, for the tenth 3,97%, F10 Adequacy of sport facilities and the eleventh 2,24% F11 Adequacy of compensation and rewarding system for coaches. Organizational efficiency is maybe the most critical dependentvariable in all organizational analysis and almost all organization theories include the term efficiency. Organizational efficiency is multidimensional construct; therefore, it is impossible to disregard factors of management. They are expressed differently, depending on direction of the research. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze those points, in order to ensure efficient usage of human resources, through development of strategic activities for issues regarding management of human resources.
Key words: organization, sport federation, efficiency, factors, latent structure.